Knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy among surgeons: a scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The rapid evolution of genetic technologies and utilization of genetic information for clinical decision-making has necessitated increased surgeon participation in genetic counselling, testing, and appropriate referral of patients for genetic services, without formal training in genetics. We performed a scoping review to describe surgeons' knowledge, perceptions, attitudes, and barriers pertaining to genetic literacy in the management of patients who had confirmed cancer or who were potentially genetically at risk. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. We performed a comprehensive literature search, and 2 reviewers independently screened studies for inclusion. These studies included surgeons involved in the care of patients with confirmed gastrointestinal, breast, and endocrine and neuroendocrine cancers, or patients who were potentially genetically at risk for these cancers. RESULTS: We analyzed 17 studies, all of which used survey or interview-based formats. Many surgeons engaged in genetic counselling, testing, and referral, but reported low confidence and comfort in doing so. Knowledge assessments showed lower confidence in identifying genetic inheritance patterns and hereditary cancer syndromes, but awareness was higher among surgeons with greater clinical volume or subspecialty training in oncology. Surgeons felt responsible for facilitating these services and explicitly requested educational support in genetics. Barriers to genetic literacy were identified and catalogued at patient, surgeon, and system levels. CONCLUSION: Surgeons frequently engage in genetics-related tasks despite a lack of formal genetics training, and often report low knowledge, comfort, and confidence in providing such services. We have identified several barriers to genetic literacy that can be used to develop interventions to enhance genetic literacy among surgeons.

Venous invasion detectable only by elastic stain shows weak prognostic value in colon cancer.

AIMS: Large venous invasion (VI) is prognostically significant in colon cancer. The increased use of elastic stains by pathologists results in higher VI detection rates compared to routine stains alone. This study assesses the prognostic value of VI detected by elastic versus routine stains. METHODS AND RESULTS: Colon cancers resected between 2014 and 2017 underwent pathology slide review for VI. Cases without VI on routine stain were stained by elastic trichrome and re-examined. Demographic, clinical, pathological and outcome data were gathered by retrospective review. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests were performed for survival categorised by VI status. Cox regression was performed for multivariate analysis. Of 277 cases, 97 (35%) showed VI by routine stain alone, with an additional 58 (21%) discovered by subsequent elastic stains. Thus, elastic trichrome increased VI detection by 60%. However, only VI detected by routine stain showed worse overall survival (P < 0.001). VI detected by elastic stain only was not prognostically different from cases without VI (P = 0.428). For stage 2 cancers, VI was not prognostically significant regardless of method of detection. For stage 3 cases, only VI detected by routine stain was prognostic for overall survival (P = 0.002) with a hazard ratio of 4.04 by multivariate regression (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: VI detectable only by elastic stains do not show prognostic significance for survival in colon cancer. For pathologists with high baseline VI detections rates on routine stain, reflexive use of elastic stain may be of limited value.

Preoperative left ventricular end-systolic dimension predicts occurrence of aortic insufficiency following aortic valve preservation and repair surgery.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative left ventricular (LV) end-systolic dimension (LVESD) ≥5.0 cm is a class IIa indication for surgical intervention for aortic insufficiency (AI); however, the effect of LV dilatation on the longevity of the aortic valve (AV) has not yet been investigated. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative LV dimension on the long-term outcome of AV preservation surgery. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 256 patients underwent AV preservation surgery at a single center. The median duration of follow-up was 5 years. The primary outcome was the development of >1+ AI at 6 years; secondary outcomes include long-term mortality, freedom from >2+ AI, and freedom from AV reoperation. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to identify predictors of AV deterioration. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.8%, and mean survival at 8 years was 85.5 ± 3.4%. Mean freedom from >1+ AI at 6 years was 71.1 ± 3.4%. Patients with preoperative indexed LVESD (LVESDi) ≥2.0 cm/m2 were at greater risk of developing >1+ AI at 6 years compared with patients with preoperative LVESDi of 1.5 to 1.9 cm/m2 and ≤1.4 cm/m2 (50.3 ± 0.1% vs 80.9 ± 0.1% vs 92.2 ± 0.1%, respectively; P < .01). On risk-adjusted multivariable analysis, preoperative LVESDi was an independent predictor for recurrence of >1+ AI (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative LVESDi ≥2 cm/m2 is associated with increased risk of recurrent >1+ AI following AV preservation surgery. Further investigation of the appropriate operative threshold for AI may be warranted.